Comments:'Wikileaks.org' taken offline in many areas after fire, court injunction

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments


Does anyone care to comment on the reason the court granted the injunction without representation from Wikileaks or why BJB's legal team failed to realise the site could be accessed by IP number (with plenty of people willing to hand that number out)? Plus it doesn't do a thing to stop the many international mirrors which exist. It seems like the RIAA suing a few individuals hoping to stop global piracy - futile. With luck wikileaks will succeed in it's stated goal to be uncensorable. Random007 - (talk) 16:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Analogy[edit]

Deleting a DNS record on a court order to prevent access to contested documents, would be like closing a library to prevent access to a book. They are attempting to deny access to a website because of something it has, not because the site itself is illegal. Cwolfsheep - (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Julius Baer press statement:

[1]

Comments from feedback form - "wish that the U.S. Government ..."[edit]

wish that the U.S. Government could trace and convict these people, sending them to their just deserts - prison. —85.211.33.238 (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from feedback form - "SUCKS"[edit]

SUCKS —140.32.16.101 (talk) 22:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from feedback form - "American Solders at risk==you ..."[edit]

American Solders at risk==you dogs —66.25.42.64 (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ROCK ON, WIKIPEDIA -THE ONLY NEWS MEDIA BREATH OF HONESTY IN 10 OR 30 YEARS[edit]

Bold text Bold textWIKIPEDIA... SPEW IT ALL OUT THERE -ESPECIALLY ABOUT NON-U.S. NATIONS BUT, YES, KEEP GIVING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY ALL THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT THEIR CORRUPT, BOUGHT OFF BY CORPORATIONS, AND CRIMINAL THINGS THESE HYPOCRITS HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH FOR THE PAST 30 YEARS WHEN REAGAN STARTED DISMANTLING OUR FOREFATHER'S DEMOCRACY AS THEY INTENDED IT -MADE FOR THE COMMON GOOD -NOT FOR MONEY-GRABBING PIGS IN BUSINESS OR POLITICAL OFFICES -ONLY FOR THEIR OWN BANK ACCOUNTS. MAYBE SIT-COMS ARE LIBERAL MEDIA BUT, THE "NEWS" MEDIA HAS BEEN -OWNED- ON CONTENT FOR THE PAST 30 YEARS. ... DO YOU WANT TO KNOW THE FACTS & FIGURES ON THE RICHEST 1 % OF OUR POPULATION TO FIND OUT WHY THE MIDDLE CLASS IS BEING EXTERMINATED TO FILL THE BANKS ACCOUNTS OF MEGA-MILLIONAIRES & BILLIONAIRES, ONLY -AND HOW THAT RELATES TO OUR ECONOMIC PROBLEMS ? BELIEVE IT, THIS IS 95 % THE DOING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND LYING PROPAGANDISTS... IN 1998 - THE RICHEST 1 % OF OUR AMERICAN POPULATION OWNED ABOUT 30 % OF ALL AMERICAN MONEY. BY 2008 -UNDER GEORGE JR'S DICTATORSHIP, THAT RICHEST 1 % OF OUR POPULATION NOW OWNS - 70 % - OF ALL U.S. MONEY -AND YOU WONDER WHY NOBODY HAS ANY MONEY ? WHY BUSINESS ISN'T GROWING ? FU K YOU CORPORATE GREEDY PIGS AND FOR BRIBING & BUYING OFF OUR POLITICIANS -TO SIGN LAWS INTO EFFECT -FOR ONE PURPOSE -FILLING THE ALREADY BLOATED BANK ACCOUNTS OF THE RICHEST PEOPLE IN THE NATION -WHO ARE THE LAST PEOPLE WHO NEEDS MORE MONEY THAN THEY ALREADY HAVE. ... F YOU TO ANY COMPANY OR COURT THAT GAGS THE TRUTH AGAIN -LIKE 8 YEARS OF TRUTH-GAG WASN'T ALREADY TOO MUCH. F YOU CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND MEGA-MILLIONAIRES. SOMEBODY ASSUMED THIS WILL HARM OUR TROOPS ? ...AFTER ABOUT 9 YEARS IN AFGANISTAN AND IRAQ... I THINK THE MID-EASTERNERS HAVE ALREADY LEARNED OUR TACTICS WELL ENOUGH TO BE EXPERTS AT THEM BUY NOW. ... HEY, DO YOU WANT TO SAVE OUT TROOPS AND FIX THE ECONOMY AT THE SAME TIME... -BRING THE TROOPS HOME3. WE'VE "ONLY" BEEN SPENDING 40 TO 50 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR ON THESE 2 WARS FOR THE PAST 9 YEARS.

Comments from feedback form - "What can we believe if some se..."[edit]

What can we believe if some secret mafia type gangsters keep taking it? We are literally living in desperate times, where information is the key to our survival as a species. —76.125.150.137 (talk) 20:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Comments:%27Wikileaks.org%27_taken_offline_in_many_areas_after_fire,_court_injunction&oldid=1160929"