Comments:'Bloody Sunday Inquiry' publishes report into British Army killing of activists in Northern Ireland

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to: navigation, search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "wow! piss poor neutrality..."710:19, 23 June 2010
Woops116:02, 19 June 2010

Comments from feedback form - "wow! piss poor neutrality..."

wow! piss poor neutrality...

H.R.H Sovereign King Bradley The Great, Autocrat of All Australia talk09:45, 21 June 2010

why?

Mrchris (talk)00:31, 22 June 2010

is my opinion, celtic!

H.R.H Sovereign King Bradley The Great, Autocrat of All Australia talk03:19, 22 June 2010

And you're being asked to back it up.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)06:43, 22 June 2010

and I am not obligated to =D

H.R.H Sovereign King Bradley The Great, Autocrat of All Australia talk23:46, 22 June 2010

opinions do not require sources or neutral view points...

H.R.H Sovereign King Bradley The Great, Autocrat of All Australia talk23:49, 22 June 2010
 
 
 
 
 

"Hey remember that nasty bout 38 years ago when we killed some people? Yeah, sorry about that. Our bad. There there, victims."

So seriously, why does it take 38 years to admit that a bunch of civilians didn't pose a threat to a military unit? Or that they were unarmed, when it should have been pretty damn easy to tell after they'd been killed?

12.31.21.15 (talk)19:40, 17 June 2010

There are lot of reasons, and almost none good. There is the fact that military inquiries are always about saving the face of the army and not about finding the truth. There is the idea that admitting the governement would damage the "honor " of the country. There is the idea that only "the others" are guilty while your side is always innocent and anything that says this to not be true is enemy propaganda. And so on and on...

95.244.229.42 (talk)16:02, 19 June 2010