Back to article
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Some youtube anonymous people also referred to two other companies, 'ContentFactory America, Inc', and "Media House Enterprises, Inc". They also calimed that the 'oschaper' account was involved in the takedown notices, and these companies, although I did not see anything saying how. I do know that accounts can be hijacked, but no one, has claimed that so far?
If the legitimacy of the claims has not been verified then why have the videos already been removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
A single DMCA notice cannot be used for multiple videos. Each request to remove a video must be submitted via seperate DMCA notices. This means that over 4000 individual DMCA had to have been submitted by American Rights Counsel LLC, and organization with no record of its existance in the United States or otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 17:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- That may be the case on how it is supposed to be done. But we have what is called a rights group which does not exist, who files this claim. The fact that they don't exist should say a lot about the way they do things, as opposed to how they should be done. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 19:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
scientology scam 
some scientology sympathizer really did a good job with this whole mass take down of anti scientology vids. bravo. i personally dont like scientology but i respect any one who can pull off a whopper like this. more kudo's to the people who catch this person... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 06:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
wow! great story, wikinews —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 06:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
This is stupid youtube is for evrey thing and evrey ne. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)