Comments:American baseball star Rodriguez admits to using performance enhancing drugs

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


"This is not a situation where any anti-doping rule was violated, but we decided to send a strong message to Michael because he disappointed so many people, particularly the hundreds of thousands of USA Swimming member kids who look up to him as a role model and a hero," USA Swimming stated (regarding Michael Phelps being busted smoking pot, a drug that unlike steroids does not increase performance or induce breast growth). Phelps and Rodriguez are similar in that they're as big as role models get. Who sees Rodriguez being suspended? Why or why not? 24.30.16.34 16:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are huge differences between USA Swimming and Major League Baseball. Phelps performs as an amateur representing his country at the Olympics (he makes his money through endorsement deals) and USA doesn't make money whether he swims or not. Rodriguez is a professional player and having Rodriguez play boosts attendance, tv ratings, etc. for his team and the league. Baseball has a financial stake in Rodriguez and therefore would not want to suspend him. Further, to do so would violate league rules as the current policy was not in place until 2004. The players' union would be up in arms if they tried. That's another thing Phelps doesn't have. There's no swimmers' union. --SVTCobra 16:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
$$$$$ and a union? Makes sense. But will he apologize to the fans? And I'd say Phelps is a professional, not an amateur, on medals/prize-money alone.24.30.16.34 22:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bud Selig and Don Fehr are to blame. We shouldn't have a witch hunt and blame just the ballplayers. Selig and Fehr wanted revenue and practically encouraged steroid use in order to make the game have more offense, and now what happens? Players are ruining their bodies and legacies just for Selig's stupid ass. He should go to prison for getting away with murder of America's pastime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.166.175.146 (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh! he was "feeling a lot of pressure"!? Sorry bud, that's professional sports, and that's why you get such a big paycheck for doing nothing useful. Get rid of him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enewe101 (talkcontribs) 01:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]