Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents
|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Comments from feedback form - "This article has a ways to go ..."||0||03:28, 24 August 2011|
|Comments from feedback form - "Very well written, very compre..."||2||21:44, 23 August 2011|
This article has a ways to go grammatically. For instance, what does it mean that he/she has destroyed the leaks TO Julian Assange's site? Do you mean he/she has removed them from the site? Punctuation and capitalization aren't perfect either; it should read, "...between the pair, and has now..."
Furthermore I think this article uses too many quotations for things that could just be reworded.
Also I believe there's more weight put on the perspective of OpenLeaks than that of Wikileaks.
Very well written, very comprehensive, very insightful. I would not have known about this issue if it wasn't for uowakm.