Comments:Government shuts off water to California farms in controversial effort to help threatened species

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Ah the green world. Where a two inch fish is more important then fish. Got to love that change.--66.229.16.126 (talk) 03:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

salvation[edit]

if economy goes on hand in hand with the distinction of species for very long, then the earth together with us humans will be next to be wiped out. so yes, the salvation of this planet might come at the cost of the suffering of those farmers. -- Torsten (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

20 bucks say you have that view point until you lose your job.--66.229.16.126 (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
now you need my account number ;) - so what's more important? employment at every price or a ecosystem you can actually have a decent life in? well, why can't we have both? -- Torsten (talk) 11:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
With a leftist Government running it. Its the two inch fish.--66.229.23.225 (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The fish wouldn't even be living there (and if it's so endagered would be extinct) without the man-made canals and is thus relatively useless and should die if it can't adapt. This is how nature works, and obviously the department in charge of preserving that doesn't fully understand the circle of life. Mufasa would be pissed. --64.90.84.103 (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the government is over looking common good. I believe that the employment rate will drop and the farmers will lose thier primary irrigation source. I believe they need to find another way to save the species.

Countdown's Keith Olberman reports on 9/24/09 that, on June 30th, the Department of the Interior turned the water back on for the Central Valley but, apparently, nobody noticed.

America's #1 small business,, Farmers[edit]

This is proof that are Government has no intention of seeing America survive this tough econamy.Government.