European Parliament rejects computer-implemented inventions directive
Wednesday, July 6, 2005
The ). The directive involved the granting of .has rejected the (software patent directive) sustained by lobbies of large software publicists such as the corporations , , and , grouped under the title of the (EICTA,
648out of 680 rejected the text, 18 voted for and 14 abstained.
A rejection vote became the expected outcome when the, initially in favour of the directive, decided to reject it.
The, and also voted for rejection of the directive for heterogeneous reason. Michel Rocard, author of a number of amendments to the original directive, said that the majority of the modifications were unlikely to be supported by the Commission and Council, with whom the Parliament would have had to enter a Conciliation procedure if it had voted for maintaining the directive in moditifed form. "Better have no text at all than a bad one", he added.
Before the vote, Rocard pointed at the irritation of the Parliament towards the: "There is collective anger throughout the Parliament because of the way the directive was handled by the Commission and the Council".
During the debate on Tuesday, Commissionertold MEPs: "Should you decide to reject the common position, the Commission will not submit a new proposal.".
The rejection was welcomed by small and medium software companies, as well as bysupporters. The Directive had been subject to an intense campaigning, within the Parliament, in the news media and on the Internet. The supporters of the Council position appear to have spent several ten millions, hiring prestigious PR agencies with at least 30-40 lobbyists who roamed the halls of the Parliament every day for 3 months, and many full-page advertisements in EU newspapers such as European Voice, EU Reporter etc. The opponents of software patentability (that is supporters of the position taken by the European Parliament in its 1st reading of 24 September 2003), coordinated under the roof of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII), also had several lobbyists stationed in Brussels, conducted several conferences and demonstrations and published some newspaper advertisements, with a total budget of nearly 100,000 eur apart from countless unpaid working hours of a dedicated supporter base, consisting mainly of programmers and software entrepreneurs.
- "Software patent bill thrown out" — , July 6, 2005
- "EU software patent law faces axe" — , July 6, 2005
- "No directive on software patents" — , July 6, 2005
- "European Parliament says No to software patents" — , July 6, 2005
- "Europe's High Tech Industry Welcomes European Parliament Decision" — , July 6, 2005
|The text of this article has been released into the public domain. In the event that this is not legally possible, this article may be used for any purpose, without any condition, unless such conditions are required by law. This applies worldwide. Copyright terms on images, however, may vary, so please check individual image pages prior to duplication.
Please note that this only applies to Wikinews content created prior to September 25, 2005. All content created after that date is released under a Creative Commons license which is mentioned at the bottom of each article. This is currently the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.