Talk:6.5 magnitude earthquake hits off California coast
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Review of revision 934738 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 934738 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Speedy review as breaking, happened within the last two hours. Will add more info if i can Tempodivalse [talk] 02:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 934738 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Speedy review as breaking, happened within the last two hours. Will add more info if i can Tempodivalse [talk] 02:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- This should have failed review, still needs copyediting imo, Cocoaguytalkcontribs‽ 02:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Considering it's fairly breaking (happened 2 hours ago, aftershocks still occurring), i think we can publish first and copyedit later. (It doesn't seem too bad actually) Tempodivalse [talk] 02:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, this is my first time playing reporter. :D Glacier Wolf 02:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I'd say this was great for your a first attempt at writing an article. There were only a few stylistic areas that needed improving, otherwise there really wasn't anything wrong with it. Tempodivalse [talk] 02:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, not bad at all, I just think it needed some more time Cocoaguytalkcontribs‽ 03:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I'd say this was great for your a first attempt at writing an article. There were only a few stylistic areas that needed improving, otherwise there really wasn't anything wrong with it. Tempodivalse [talk] 02:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, this is my first time playing reporter. :D Glacier Wolf 02:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Considering it's fairly breaking (happened 2 hours ago, aftershocks still occurring), i think we can publish first and copyedit later. (It doesn't seem too bad actually) Tempodivalse [talk] 02:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)