Talk:Cheney-Rumsfeld "Cabal" alleged in the USA

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

country?[edit]

this article needs to identify what country this refers to in the title. --MateoP 02:39, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Newsworthy? It's a quote[edit]

Enough said. Develop. Incomplete. Tagged. --MrMiscellaniousMerry Christmas04:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct; when I added the second source I accidentally went over the "develop" prompt. Neutralizer 05:06, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Move it (the quote) to Wikiquote, then delete develop. As is, there's no news here yet. -- NeoAmsterdam 09:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC), edited 13:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I did not have much time to develop last night; have tried to this Am; there is lots of interest in this as a news story;[1]. What's going on? Neutralizer 13:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
OK - I've had my nicotine, I've had my caffeine, and I've read the sources through twice. I'm still not seeing a news item here - Just a war of words born on an op-ed page. Either way I'll keep my ears and eyes open in case it does develop . -- NeoAmsterdam 14:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(And for the record, I'm no fan of this alleged "administration")

confused[edit]

I thought we all worked collaboratively. Is the initial editor now supposed to bring an article all the way through the developing stage? Neutralizer 13:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[removes foot from mouth] -- NeoAmsterdam 14:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for patience,neo. Neutralizer 14:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
that's the way it's supposed to be, but the vast majority of editors do nothing but bring issues to the talk page or add wikilinks or categories. Only a few of us actually do the research to write things. --MateoP 22:12, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

tag removal now?[edit]

I'll wait awhile to see if MrM still has a problem. Neutralizer 14:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Will remove in an hour if no objections.

No objections on my part. -- NeoAmsterdam 14:39, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]