Talk:Craigslist sued for hosting discriminatory housing ads

I descided to experement with a new style of linking to blogs for discussions, as we chatted about discussions here recently. Can someone add a 2nd blog thought? I don't like listing just slashdot. Nyarlathotep 14:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Don't see anything. This is similiar to the class action lawsuit against 'pedia in many ways. Bawolff ☺☻

This article declined to mention some of the more benign ads labled as descriminatory in the lawsuit: "All in a vibrant southwest Hispanic neighborhood offering great classical Mexican culture, restaurants and businesses", and "Apartment is situated on 8th floor of building teeming with young people. It is unfurnished but ideal for a student or young single professional" are among the ones that were missed. 152.121.19.61 02:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't exactly consider those discriminatory more than it is attractive to a specific clientele. Anyways, the article has been long published, and those ads may have come after the fact. —this is messedrocker (talk) 02:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Typos

{{editprotected}} The dates in the sources all say 'Febuary'. This should obviously be 'February'. Van der Hoorn (talk) 13:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

• Done--Brian McNeil / ^talk 13:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)