Talk:Former Satyam CEO Raju, his brother and CFO arrested and detained in profit-fraud scandal
I CREATED this dire Hyderabad economic tragedy amid the Mumbai attacks and looming India's war with Pakistan. Please help in publishing it. Cheers.--Florentino Floro (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Headline is too long. --Hemanshu (talk) 10:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the fraud of the century[edit]
- While the Madoff is a Ponzi, this is a mystic scandal, amazing and had really flabbergasted the economic genius. I had not studied economics but this a a real stuff. With the title, I know it is too too long, but I wanted their names put in there, since I do not know how Google search works. Anyway, I am only the creator, and I hope that with good collaboration my SYNTHESIS article will be a better view of all the facts. Cheers.--Florentino Floro (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
27 sources[edit]
This is a very fluid and painful article closely watched worldwide by shocked investors and 53,000 displaced employees. Class lawsuits by dozens are being raced to get the big chunk survival of the fittest. I took pains NOT TO DUPLICATE the sources, such that one source just states a different set of facts from others. So, my work or article is a BIG SYNTHESIS of all the 24 news reports worldwide, but condensed into a telescopic view of the fraud. I hope the reviewer will have more time to check and make the style better. I am just a creator and this is a collaboration. Cheers.--Florentino Floro (talk) 07:01, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Review[edit]
 |
Revision 751167 of this article has been reviewed by PatrickFlaherty (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A really good article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 751167 of this article has been reviewed by PatrickFlaherty (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A really good article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
add cat[edit]
{{editprotected}} can u plz add the Category:Nissan on the article .—Emad_PhD (talk) 08:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- @عماد الدين المقدسي: I hadn't thought this one was really related enough to warrant the category. Unless I'm missing something, it doesn't look as if Nissan participates in the news activity reported. --Pi zero (talk) 13:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)