This is at the very outside of freshness, because of the chosen focus. It's good Abbott's remarks Thursday are in the lede; it'd be nice if they were in the headline, though I'm not thinking of how to do that (and it doesn't help that freshness with current headline requires publishing pronto). If the UN comments were worked in that'd be good too, but that would open a whole other can of worms. But rather than dither over the matter till midnight UTC passes and the freshness situation becomes much worse, I'm running with it.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
This is at the very outside of freshness, because of the chosen focus. It's good Abbott's remarks Thursday are in the lede; it'd be nice if they were in the headline, though I'm not thinking of how to do that (and it doesn't help that freshness with current headline requires publishing pronto). If the UN comments were worked in that'd be good too, but that would open a whole other can of worms. But rather than dither over the matter till midnight UTC passes and the freshness situation becomes much worse, I'm running with it.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
