Talk:No assassination plot against US presidential candidate Barack Obama
Review[edit]
 |
Revision 684672 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good article, Gopher65talk 04:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 684672 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good article, Gopher65talk 04:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Misleading Title[edit]
Can you change the title to something more, well concrete? Saying "No assassination plot against US presidential candidate Barack Obama" sounds as if there is NONE. I think something like: "Men arrested in Denver not involved in assassination plot". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.6.83 (talk) 12:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Depends on your definition of plot[edit]
A plot is a set of people with a desire who purposefully go about getting the means to carry out that desire. It seems clear that these men had the desire and some of the means (firearms), while they lacked other necessary means (place, etc.) and perhaps also the ability to purposefully acquire them (due to their drug-addled state).
I think the best fix is to give a source in the headline, thus avoiding taking a stand on the definition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.170.103 (talk) 20:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)