Talk:Nokia takes over Symbian OS development

Review of revision 1126977 [Passed]

Revision 1126977 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1126977 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

I wish this article wasn't in pre-archive mode, because it really, really needs a copyedit. Please read over articles carefully in order to make sure that the grammar is halfway passable. Gopher65_talk 04:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

? I thought grammar fixes were OK with consensus --InfantGorilla (talk) 21:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah, grammar is not considered a content edit under WN:ARCHIVE. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

I tried to fix some of the worst grammar. (I think the intended meaning is unchanged, although it can be difficult to judge the intended meaning in such cases.) --Pi zero (talk) 00:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)