Although I'm allowing it this time, VOA and BBC is not a good choice of two sources; BBC is apt to largely accept the VOA spin (and VOA is relentless in its imposition of spin), and the dependence of a source on VOA is difficult to track unless the source has a very different perspective (because VOA is public domain so can be used freely if one wants to embrace its POV). I recommend using a source with a different perspective, as a matter of course — Al Jazeera English or RT, for instance.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
Although I'm allowing it this time, VOA and BBC is not a good choice of two sources; BBC is apt to largely accept the VOA spin (and VOA is relentless in its imposition of spin), and the dependence of a source on VOA is difficult to track unless the source has a very different perspective (because VOA is public domain so can be used freely if one wants to embrace its POV). I recommend using a source with a different perspective, as a matter of course — Al Jazeera English or RT, for instance.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
