Talk:Wikinews interviews Spain's most decorated Paralympian, Teresa Perales

This article is a featured article.
It is considered one of the best works of the Wikinews community.
See the archived discussion.

Journalist notes

On Thursday, I traveled with Raystorm to Zaragoza in Spain to interview Teresa Perales. This interview was arranged via e-mail. The actual interview can be found on the article itself in ogg format. I used the translation template that pi zero recommended, which includes a Spanish translation from the original. The on spot translation was left out of the interview. In some cases, Teresa responded in English and the Spanish translation of her English comments is provided to improve the flow and to keep the formatting consistent. --LauraHale (talk) 10:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1777741 [Passed]

Revision 1777741 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I was uncertain of the intent of "this has to be potentiated before", but decided it's not really a problem. The Spanish is available (both written and audio), and the sense of the overall answer in which it occurs seems clear; if the reader is uncertain of the meaning, it should be a harmless sort of uncertainty. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1777741 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I was uncertain of the intent of "this has to be potentiated before", but decided it's not really a problem. The Spanish is available (both written and audio), and the sense of the overall answer in which it occurs seems clear; if the reader is uncertain of the meaning, it should be a harmless sort of uncertainty. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.