Comments from feedback form - "why no inline citations like w..."
why no inline citations like wikipedia? fails my sniff test verifiability, etc. i'll stick to reading actual news sites such as bbc, cnn, abcnews, nbcnews, nytimes, daily telegraph, al jazeera, et al.
emend my earlier entry. also, will also just continue to go to wikipedia for the broad, comprehensive picture since wikipedia is heavily sourced with inline citations.
<laughs> Wikipedia should not be considered reliable. They do no peer review, so you're misinformed as to what constitutes "reliable".
I agree that their articles probably have more detail; that is because they're encyclopedic, not actual news reports.