Original reporting notes [edit]
I interviewed Sarah Warbelow, Indiana State Legislative director for HRC by phone on 3/15/12 All her comments used in the article have attributes for her. Otherwise the information did not come from her.
Review of revision 1463585 [Not ready] [edit]
 |
Revision 1463585 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC).
- Copyright:
 Not reviewed. Please address other issues.
- Newsworthiness:
 Not ready: I have concerns; see below.
- Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues.
- NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues.
- Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues.
Comments by reviewer:
- Newsworthiness calls for the focal news "event or phenomenon" to be specific, relevant, and fresh.
- A canonical example: continental drift is not newsworthy, but an earthquake may be. Note that someone putting out a report about continental drift, or an interview with someone about continental drift, might be newsworthy; it's certainly specific enough, so it'd be down to relevance and freshness.
-
- The focus described by the headline and lede here appears to be in itself not nearly specific enough. It's way too spread out in time, over years.
- Freshness is moderately straightforward for synthesis. But for OR, it depends on the nature of the OR. A major interview might have quite a shelf life, depending on the nature of the interview but probably a few weeks.
- The element here seemingly specific enough is that an interview took place. That is specific. But if I'm understanding the (curt but perhaps adequate) OR notes correctly, there appear to be only two bits of the article that are actually from the interview, and they don't seem to be substantial enough to build an article on. Further, the interview took place nearly a month ago, and even with a major interview we'd likely be glancing nervously at the clock by now.
Questions about the above? Ask.
If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
