User talk:Auroranorth~enwikinews

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Auroranorth~enwikinews, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these!

Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews:

There are always things to do on Wikinews:

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Thunderhead - (talk - email - contributions) 03:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quiz[edit]

Thanks for starting a quiz, I see you've 7 questions. Having set a full quiz in the past I know how difficult it can be to get the last 3 to make 10. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accreditation[edit]

Contributions on other projects is certainly worth mentioning, it can help prove that you know the underlying principles/policies that operate across all sites. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry your accreditation request did not pass this time, you may like to follow the hints given by brian and try again sometime in the future. thanks --MarkTalk to me 23:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent articles[edit]

Your recent articles have been based on a single source. It is strongly encouraged that you use two or more independent sources. --SVTCobra 11:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I despair over that. Our news sources in Australia are very broken-off. What's headlines in one newspaper might not even get a spot in another. When it's possible I do try to find more than one source in everything I do (even research papers). Auroranorth 12:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you should improve your skills in searching for news online. Google News can be helpful. It was really not hard to find additional sources for each of these stories: Reserve Bank of Australia considers interest rate rise, Teachers union says Melbourne Cup may be educational opportunity, and Australia Votes 2007: Howard and Rudd take 'me-tooism' to new heights. Australia is not a third-world country. More than one paper covers things such as the Melbourne Cup, the RBA and the Election. --SVTCobra 14:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two sources that rely on the same news wire agency don't count as independent sources, see Australian soldier dies in East Timor barracks. news.com.au and herald sun were reporting the exact same story from aap. --SVTCobra 14:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't take this one too hard, you need to learn how to spot what appear to be independent reports done off the same wire service like AAP, Reuters, or AFP. Most people don't click on that immediately. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's OK, I already knew they were exactly the same report. I thought it might be better to link to the different sources as only Newscorp websites have the story up. My state's paper (The West Australian) hasn't written a report on it yet - well, as of last night, anyway. I will update it shortly. Auroranorth 03:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am not trying to be a pain or overly strict, but adding a source from the next day is not appropriate either. The logic behind is that you can't have a story from Nov 6 that relies on sources from Nov 7, for example. While you were off-line, I did add an independent source to this particular story. Your articles are good and deserve to published, but if you cannot find more than one indpendent source, please do not publish, leave the article in 'development' and we will most likely get what's needed done a bit later. Oh, and if there is significant news/updates the next day, please start a new article. --SVTCobra 03:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do not find that you are being overly strict. I want to improve my work on Wikinews and I'm accepting all the (constructive) criticism I can get! Thank you, Auroranorth 12:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Auroranorth. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Auroranorth~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

06:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Auroranorth~enwikinews&oldid=3427272"