User talk:Kad388UOW

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Human Rights Watch: concern for exploited children in Senegal remains[edit]

With deep regret, I have to say, this one seems to have gotten away from us. Unless there's something you can do to freshen it, of course, but I'm not sure how that would happen, here. See my review comments, and detailed history of edits during review.

I'm really hoping you can get a whole lot of experience out of this article, because really, the most effective way to avoid long review processes on en.wn is to submit clean copy that passes its first review, and to do that, there's no substitute for experience. --Pi zero (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I put deep thought into this review. Please see my review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

Thanks for your article! Unfortunately, it's not ready to be published. I've left some comments on the talk page, but I thought I'd also give you some tips:

I've marked this article not ready on the grounds of it being effectively {{single source}}, as both sources share an author. Thinking about this, it seems a great chance to grab some original reporting. The school has contact details here, both general and specicifcally for the principal. Westboro take media requests via an email listed here.

I'm not sure exactly how your Wikinews articles tie in with your course grades, but I suspect Crtew (talk · contribs) would be very pleased to see some OR done on your own initiative. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 20:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Remark: Crtew is the other class we've got submitting articles here lately.  :-) --Pi zero (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
<blinks> That he is. And on the other side of the world. I'm confusing myself :P BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 21:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it. I've got a short statement from the principle confirming that the photograph tweeted by WBC is a student and was part of the performance. He also confirmed Westboro did not attend the school production at all. I'm also trying to get in touch with WBC by email. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kad388UOW (talkcontribs)

Cool! For an example of how I tend to deal with this kind of OR (getting statements), see here. Basically, I cut out the email headers and supply the full body of the messages on talk, and forward to scoop as well [scoop AT wikinewsie DOT org]. Good luck :) BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 16:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I emailed WBC last night, I didn't get a response but the tweets from last week appear to have been removed since last night - I have been trawling back and forth on their twitter feed looking for them - and they had tweeted that they would picket the school tomorrow. So I emailed again with further questions about why they would picket the school on a Saturday and if they were aware that according to the school's calendar, the performance was a one-off as well as a question about the photograph they had tweeted on the 2nd, but although it looks like I have had an effect on them, I haven't received any response to my questions. Kad388UOW (talk) 01:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If they still haven't replied they probably won't ever. I'd say the material you have is good enough. The OR statement from the principal is sufficient corroborative evidence for sourcing and lets us get a quote in, and the additional observation that stuff has vanished from the WBC Twitter is a nice exclusive touch to add too. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 16:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Email correspondence with Margaret River Senior High School Principle:

Sent Thursday April 3 2014


I am a journalism student from the University of Wollongong, and I have recently published an article on wikinews about Westboro's threats to picket your school's performance of the Laramie Project. I am preparing a second article to report on their failure to appear and wanted to give you the opportunity to comment on the lack of follow through.

Also, could you please confirm for me that the attached image is a student performing and not a WBC member? The image was tweeted by the group with text to the effect of 'westboro pickets Margaret River High School'.

I am also contacting WBC for comment and would greatly appreciate your input.

Thank you,

Received Thursday April 3 2013

Hi

I can confirm that this is an image from the play and not a protest by the WBC. The WBC did not attend the school at anytime during the Play production


Thank you, I thought I had sent it to scoop, but I went back and checked and it turns out I had mistyped the email address. I'll fix all that up straight away. Thank you all for all your help, I'm really learning a lot Kad388UOW (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see the emails on scoop now. Hopefully, if someone else doesn't review the article sooner, I may be able to review it in the morning (which probably means after you go to bed tonight; the timezone difference between here and Australia is brutal). I've learned never to promise to review an article, because, well, stuff happens. I do hope, though. :-)  --Pi zero (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'll understand if you don't get to it. Honestly, I'm just excited about doing a little original reporting. Kad388UOW (talk) 03:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Published. Cool. review comments. I see that also made three published articles related to The Laramie Project, and BRS created a category for it. (Three published articles is our usual threshold for creating a cat.) --Pi zero (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I've read the review comments and taken note. Thanks again for all the guidance. Kad388UOW (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikinews pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four w:tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the w:Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Microchip08 (talk) 08:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I didn't know that! Kad388UOW (talk) 01:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can also indent lines using :, which makes things easier to read on talk pages (as everything has a thread). :-) Microchip08 (talk) 01:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article you contributed to, Car stackers could solve Sydney's parking problem, has not yet been published, but has not been edited for a significant period of time. Please consider taking another look at it, and trying to fix the problems the reviewer raised. You can then submit it for re-review, and hopefully it will be published. If the article is not edited after two days, it will be deleted (or moved out of the main article space, as appropriate). Thanks, Microchip08 (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been searching for day for a second source, to assist in making this article publishable. I can't find anything except the source used, unless the author has something else, triangulation of sources is near impossible. Kad388UOW (talk)