Comment Although you're evidently enthusiastic and have learned and made a few good contributions (great!), I see no sign of interest in original reporting, which is what accreditation is for. Accreditation would mean the Wikinews community vouches for your conduct as a reporter, e.g. to potential interviewees; we'd be making you a representative of the community in that conduct. Wikinews works on accumulated reputation, as WN:Never assume notes.
questions Have you read WN:OR and WN:AP? (Also of interest, WN:COE.) Are you interested in doing OR? Why do you want accreditation? --Pi zero (talk) 01:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Comment Although I'm not changing my vote, I will say that there are certain people (I'm not accusing you of being one of them, but I'm just saying, some people) have this silly fixation that they can't do OR unless they're accredited. That's ridiculous! You can gain comments from all sort of people about BIG EVENTS without a shred of accreditation!! Heck, you can listen to a broadcast on THE RADIO and if documented properly, that's perfectly great OR. Just my two-cents. Bddpaux (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Support Here's what I think: you haven't contributed alot here, but I think you will in the near future....I just have a feeling. So, I say sure! Bddpaux (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Wait I'd like to hear your response to the above comments and questions. --Pi zero (talk) 01:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose I'd like to see you contributing more before becoming an accredited reporter. Diego Grez (talk) 17:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.