Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/DragonFire1024 4
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
DragonFire1024[edit]
This Wikinewsie has been a great assistance to Wikinews, contributing to hundreds of stories, including an entire series of articles, since he first joined. His last RFA was three months ago, and I'm sure he's definitely learned from his mistakes by now. I would be honored if this user could serve Wikinews as an administrator. —this is messedrocker (talk) 00:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please accept or reject nomination here:
- Support as nominator. —
this is messedrocker(talk)00:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC) - Support. Great contributions to Wikinews. If the user is happy to serve in the custodial role, great! -- IlyaHaykinson 01:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Great contributor, energetic, a welcome addition to the administration team - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 05:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Contributor's history does not inspire trust. - Amgine | talk en.WN 06:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- And what have I done to that would be distrustful? You have always said that but have yet to state a reason as to why. Jason Safoutin 15:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support PVJ(Talk)
12:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- That was not the reason for that and I think you are well aware of that. Jason Safoutin 17:09, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note that with the exception of one block all were overturned almost immediately. Jason Safoutin 15:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support I have been away for a while, but before I left I had noticed that my objections from last time seemed to no longer be true, and was considering renominating him/her myself sometime in the near future, I think DragonFire has learned from his/her mistakes, assuming nothing derastic has happened when I was away, would be a great admin. Bawolff ☺☻
04:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. —a word about the admin de-admin incident that was mentioned above (which I'm assuming was in response to the arbcom and mrm thing, correct me if I'm wrong). I disagreed with that strongly (de-admining everyone), (and still do) however we all make mistakes, and I don't think an isolated incident a while ago, is enough to stop you from becoming an admin. Bawolff ☺☻ 04:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. —a word about the admin de-admin incident that was mentioned above (which I'm assuming was in response to the arbcom and mrm thing, correct me if I'm wrong). I disagreed with that strongly (de-admining everyone), (and still do) however we all make mistakes, and I don't think an isolated incident a while ago, is enough to stop you from becoming an admin. Bawolff ☺☻
- Support because a Wkinewsian. -Edbrown05 07:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Jacques Divol 08:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support - I trust this user to be an admin. FellowWikiNews (W) 17:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry DF, but as you know, I oppose the nominations of most editors.I was really on the borderline about voting for you this time though; irregardless, this time, as Meatloaf once said about sex in a car by the dashboard light; "Oh my God, I think he's gonna' make it!" Neutralizer 22:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 19:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Nzgabriel | My RfA | Talk page 04:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.