Here's the deal, I was looking at our bot list and noticed a bunch of bots are inactive. Since bot edits are hidden by default, I think we should remove the bot flag for those that don't need/use it. If they become reactive, we can give them back their flag very easily. Every bot on this list hasn't edited this year. If you have a reason to keep a specific bots flag, say so, otherwise this is a "1 for all" vote. --ShakataGaNai^_^ 01:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Andrewbot (talk · contribs) - Hasn't been used since 2005. Additionally it's stated purpose is fixing double redirects which is handled by ZacharyBot.
Support the de-flagging of each of these bots. --SVTCobra 01:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Most of these bots are now redundant as they have been replaced by other, more active bots which do the same tasks. The majority of these will likely never be used again, and the few that will can easily go through the bot process again. Tempodivalse[talk] 01:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Support per Tempo — Gopher65talk 02:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Support - Seems uncontroversial. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Seems reasonable. Cirt (talk) 19:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Support sensible preemptive maintenance. --Brian McNeil / talk 21:17, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Done All listed bots deflagged, after unanimous support and no objections in about seven days. Tempodivalse[talk] 12:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)----
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.