Comments:Chavez says planted demolitions in World Trade Center 'plausible'
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
First Holocaust denial, now 9-11 denial. What's next? Contralya 07:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
According to the article "Chavez did not specifically accuse the U.S. government of having a hand in the Sept. 11 attacks, but rather suggested that theories of U.S. involvement bear examination." So that means now he did not suggest that the U.S. planned the hoax, he mearly suggested that it is not outside the realm of plausibility that the buildings were demolished. I don't believe it personally but there are many, even in the United States who do. Anyway the idea that by asserting the possibility of the buildings being demolished is the same as asserting U.S. government involvement is POV and should be changed. How do you edit the article?