Comments:China kills suspected terrorists, prevents 'air disaster'

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


What's with the quotations around terrorist gang and terrorists? Do we just instantly assume any news that comes out of China is circumspect? --131.104.254.224 16:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

"Terrorist", "terrorism", etc. are not NPOV and should never be presented as fact. 69.14.16.27 23:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Spencer German —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.207.78 (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I think questioning the authenticity of news stories from China is sensible. China hasn't included any specific information in its claims. Also, this story originates from a government source, it's not something the media uncovered. They are simply reporting what they were told. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.160.1.45 (talk) 04:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Are there any eye-witnesses to this incident? Can't find any on the major news sites. Hmm. --217.155.73.38 09:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC) darri

I also have to wonder whether the writer of this piece is too anti-China? The title is "China kills suspected terrorists," but I see no mention of killing in here at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cade (talkcontribs) 03:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "POOR, BUT GOOD LAYOUT"[edit]

POOR, BUT GOOD LAYOUT —217.23.228.149 (talk) 13:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)