Comments:Facebook and UK government clash over tributes to killer
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.
lolpocrisy
It's almost like Facebook has some sort of moral. They should really pick their fights better. I mean, they piss off the users all the time, but they won't do it the time the UK asks them to? Shouldn't have used up your piss-off-credits so quickly, Facebook.
but yeah, Raoul Moat, true hero, I hate authority (my parents), etc.. 174.88.205.164 (talk) 02:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I wonder what makes Facebook care about this more than other instances of free expression? GarrickW (talk) 04:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Good for Facebook
It's nice to see a company supporting free speech for once. Facebook didn't have to leave those pages up, it's a private company and owns that page; I'm glad they chose to act as a free and unrestrained nexus of expression. I don't agree with the page in question, but no speech should be censored by a government. NYKevin (talk) 00:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)