Comments:Mobile operator Orange bills French doctor €160,000 for one month of Internet use

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Wow[edit]

Running 24/24 7/7 this would be 350 kilobytes per second....Some performance

57.67.17.1 (talk) 11:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive? Yes[edit]

With all the fine print and misleading information, I would say that cell phone providers all over the world are deceptive in their offers. $49.99 for UNLIMITED* Internet is anything but. DWolf2k2 (talk) 03:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook, YouTube and emails only[edit]

Of course all they did was surfing Facebook, YouTube, sending emails with attachments... We all know 16 and 19 yo people do not use Internet traffic in any other way than that... I'm not talking about illegal download (which everyone does), but do not think these people only do some "usual" everyday Internet use... --70.35.160.100 (talk) 19:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bandwidth should not be charged[edit]

I think its humane not to charge people by their usage especially when you are paying more than normal package .

The network should be free and accessible for every one . Of course heavy bandwidth consuming applications should be discouraged but not blocked.--Pavi (talk) 19:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia[edit]

Viewing this article would cost €0.03 under that plan --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 07:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive, unfair.[edit]

Charging people based on what they do on the Internet is just... Well.. Idiotic. I honestly cant see why you would agree to such a plan, unless they were being decpetive

Clarification[edit]

Let me see if I understand this correctly: the customer paid for unlitied TIME on an internet connection that was high-speed, but had a data cap? Looks to me like he was out-right lied to. He did not, in fact, purchace 'unlimited internet' as he thought he did; he purchased only however long it takes to download to that cap. Can you sue companies for false advertising in France? --CyberStormAlpha (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]