Comments:Reserve Bank of India announces plan to list systemically important banks
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.
Terrible move for India.
[edit]Bailing out banks only gives bad actors less accountability. Iceland, for example, nationalized domestic debt (preventing mortgage foreclosures, and loss of industry) and let the banks with bad (largely speculative) international debts fail; they prosecuted the ones in charge, and saw a recovery a mere 2 years later. The US should not be viewed as a role model. random.user (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- The idea seems to be to require the systemically important banks to keep more cash on hand, so they're less likely to have a problem. Pi zero (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)