Comments:UK Prime Minister David Cameron calls for British air strikes against IS in Syria
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Contradiction with the policies | 0 | 10:29, 29 November 2015 |
After getting re-elected earlier this year with 331 seats in parliament, the conservative party promised a huge number of reforms and policies but making airstrikes against IS in Syria was never a part of those promises as published in an article by BBC[1]. Speaking of long term strategy it still doesn't seems fruitful. While making a call for anti-IS strikes in Syria, allies should keep in mind the collateral damages these strikes can cause, which is also a violation of Human Rights. A huge number of civilians are still trapped in areas under IS control. Apart from these facts before making a call for airstrikes parliament should consider Jeremy Corbyn's(Leader of the UK's opposition Labour Party) statement that it is not sure that airstrikes will eliminate the threat completely and these airstrikes can trigger terrorist attacks in UK[2].