Comments:US FAA to make airliner fuel tank inertion mandatory over 1996 air disaster
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
This is twelve years too late to the day, but I'm delighted that this is finally set to become a reality in the US. That means any Boeing anywhere is gonna have the gear, as will others built there. Hopefully others will see that to sell to the US they need to offer it free, and therefore on all planes, not just ones for US customers. If Airbus will just follow suit... Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
<?sarcasm?> I'm probably more likely to die driving to work than in an airline as it is. This simply adds additional costs to the all ready struggling airline industry in the U.S.
</?sarcasm?> QUINTIX (talk) 14:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Which is why it should've been done in 2002 when it was ready and airlines could afford it easily. I think I share that view with one of the sources, too. Realistically, grants should be availible, but they won't be. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)