Comments:US Supreme Court refuses to block "don't ask, don't tell" policy in US Military

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "Was President Obama sincere in..."010:14, 14 November 2010
Comments from feedback form - "We need more alternatives for ..."109:23, 14 November 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Was President Obama sincere in..."

Was President Obama sincere in his promise to rid themilitary of Don't Ask Don't tell? There was no reason for him to order the Attorney General to appeal the decision of federal Judge Virginia Phillps which made the law unconstitutional. It was no longer necessary to repeal the law, the Court did it for him. It is reached a point with President Obama shere one really doesn't know where he stands on anything. His words have become beautiful but meaningless, his actions confusing. If he like the job, and wants to be re-elected in 2012, he'd best return return to, and make the policies of his 2008 campaign the actions of his administration in 2011 and 2012. Perhaps he has already decided that he wants no more than one term and would enjoy retiring as President with all its benefits.

74.76.177.22 (talk)10:14, 14 November 2010

Comments from feedback form - "We need more alternatives for ..."

We need more alternatives for news

68.3.82.167 (talk)00:26, 14 November 2010

Let's try to find more alternatives!The article is vey interesting!Really!

82.48.114.32 (talk)09:23, 14 November 2010