Talk:"Crimea is a 'red line' for Putin": Dr. Jeremy Morris discusses Ukraine war developments with Wikinews

Notes

Emails forwarded to scoop. Heavy Water (talk) 22:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Title

I don't like 'at one-year mark', because Dr Morris actually sent the emails on 27 Feb, and also because this isn't a 'retrospective' à la [1] but rather a standard interview about Borrell's comments. Would something like "Wikinews interviews Dr. Jeremy Morris over Ukraine war developments", or otherwise emphasising the interview centres on new war progress &c. work? JJLiu112 (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

True (to clarify, Borrell's comments are not the focal point of the interview, they're simply mentioned as context-perhaps I should move them out of the first sentence). That sounds like a good title; I never particularly liked this one, that will allow me to incorporate a quote. Heavy Water (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

I like the new title. Although, insofar as they justify and contextualise the interview itself, Borrell’s comments therefore BECOME the focal point. Not like the war itself isn’t reason enough, obviously, but it would be like how television would present a story or development and then bring on some expert to talk about it. JJLiu112 (talk) 23:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Done Heavy Water (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Review of revision 4714509 [Passed]

Revision 4714509 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good short sharp informative interview The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4714509 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good short sharp informative interview The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.