Talk:78th British Academy Film Awards held in London

Review of revision 4840639 [Passed]

Revision 4840639 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See the edit history for a full list of changes made during the review process. Some minor nit-picking over sourcing statements—I'm still erroring on the side of caution as a new reviewer. Remember to proof everything before requesting a review. I had to correct a pub date and a URL in the Sources section. Watch for style issues, such as italicizing titles of works of art such as movie titles and capitalizing award titles. I also used the full name of the awards as much as possible. The article contains more wikilinks that I would normally prefer (we don't write encyclopedia articles). In this case, I think they all provide value to the reader. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4840639 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See the edit history for a full list of changes made during the review process. Some minor nit-picking over sourcing statements—I'm still erroring on the side of caution as a new reviewer. Remember to proof everything before requesting a review. I had to correct a pub date and a URL in the Sources section. Watch for style issues, such as italicizing titles of works of art such as movie titles and capitalizing award titles. I also used the full name of the awards as much as possible. The article contains more wikilinks that I would normally prefer (we don't write encyclopedia articles). In this case, I think they all provide value to the reader. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.