Talk:Australian Government proposes amendments to Racial Discrimination Act

Comments

There are a bunch of basic style tasks that could have been done by the reporter, here. Is it possible for a reviewer to do them? Sure, in the sense that a reviewer is permitted to do them; but reviewer labor is always a scarce resource, and given (as now) a choice of a whole bunch of articles on the review queue, if a reviewer has a small block of time available to review something, they're more likely to choose something that will make most efficient use of their time (rather than something that'll wear them out dealing with small stuff before they get to the big things — the source check).

• Key words in the article should be wikilinked using {{w}}. See the WN:Style guide.
• There should be an infobox, and categories. See WN:WRITE.
• Sources should be listed from newest to oldest.

--Pi zero (talk) 13:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. And Done. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 11:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2505643 [Passed]

Revision 2505643 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2505643 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.