Talk:Australian Nationals leave Coalition with Liberal Party
Add topicAbout Dutton lost his seat
[edit]"The election itself was historic, with Liberal leader Peter Dutton losing his seat to a Labor MP (the first to do so in the country's history) after leading the party to one of the most decisive election defeats in Australian history. " Did John Howard also lose his seat to a Labour member? I don't think "the first to do so in the country's history" is clear enough. Best wishes. Sheminghui.WU (talk) 07:32, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Also,I think maybe you should mention that the National Party leader has said he will seek to restructure the coalition with the Liberal Party. That will be better. Sheminghui.WU (talk) 07:36, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure If I'll do it now, but when I first wrote the story they hadn't announced that they were looking at getting back together. I (or someone) should probably add that. TheDowningStreetCat (talk) 23:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, clarified the statement a bit more. You can change it if it's not clear enough. Also added that Dutton is the first opposition leader to lose his seat in a federal election. TheDowningStreetCat (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- OK. For the getting back together, you can read https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-20/federal-politics-may-20/105311448#live-blog-post-181847
- Best wishes. Sheminghui.WU (talk) 00:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Sheminghui.WU please see below thanks Gryllida (talk) 09:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Review of revision 4860154 [Not ready]
[edit]  |
Revision 4860154 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Hi @George Ho @Wikiwide @BigKrow @Lofi Gurl @Back ache @Md Mobashir Hossain @Almondo2025, @Dsuke1998AEOS, @Ternera, @Monsieur2137 @Asked42, @Sheminghui.WU, @excelblue (if you want yourself removed or someone else added to this list, please inquire here) A revision has been requested. Here is a list of what to do. (If/when you intend to start working on it, please Subscribe to this section and to this talk page, and post reply messages here when you started and finished editing) See below: 1) remove theguardian source, it is paywalled 2) add location in the first paragraph, apparently the parliament house 3) add a sentence about what happened to shadow cabinet (optional) 4) find another source for '1923' as now in the two remaining sources after theguardian was taken away i don't see this information Thanks. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4860154 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Hi @George Ho @Wikiwide @BigKrow @Lofi Gurl @Back ache @Md Mobashir Hossain @Almondo2025, @Dsuke1998AEOS, @Ternera, @Monsieur2137 @Asked42, @Sheminghui.WU, @excelblue (if you want yourself removed or someone else added to this list, please inquire here) A revision has been requested. Here is a list of what to do. (If/when you intend to start working on it, please Subscribe to this section and to this talk page, and post reply messages here when you started and finished editing) See below: 1) remove theguardian source, it is paywalled 2) add location in the first paragraph, apparently the parliament house 3) add a sentence about what happened to shadow cabinet (optional) 4) find another source for '1923' as now in the two remaining sources after theguardian was taken away i don't see this information Thanks. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 4860319 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 4860319 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I scream in despair, having slept for 8 hours and there was no response to my comments above. I responded by removing the 1923 phrase and removing theguardian source. Highly recommended to re add the 1923 phrase with additional source, and a sentence about effects on shadow cabinet as according to my car radio it is an essential part of the story, and the sources linked here also mention this. Please do this within next 24 hours. Thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4860319 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I scream in despair, having slept for 8 hours and there was no response to my comments above. I responded by removing the 1923 phrase and removing theguardian source. Highly recommended to re add the 1923 phrase with additional source, and a sentence about effects on shadow cabinet as according to my car radio it is an essential part of the story, and the sources linked here also mention this. Please do this within next 24 hours. Thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Coalition is looking at reforming
[edit]A lot of recent news is saying that the parties are getting back together. While the article is dated to before this happened, I'm still not sure if this new info should be included since it would probably require moving the article. Just seems misleading to say that they have only split, especially since it was only published very recently. Would like to know what others think of this. TheDowningStreetCat (talk) 23:15, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- And that article now exists, see Australian Coalition reunited after one week TheDowningStreetCat (talk) 01:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Post-publication corrections
[edit]I corrected Green’s first name and removed unsourced or interpretive statements to align with Wikinews' NPOV and verifiability policies. Since these edits were made within 24 hours of publication and reflect reviewer actions typically performed during a formal (and full) review, I have self-sighted the changes in accordance with policy. —Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 16:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)