Talk:Bangladesh beat hosts Myanmar 2–1 to qualify for 2026 AFC Women's Asian Cup
Add topicReview of revision 4867405 [Passed]
[edit]| |
Revision 4867405 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Copyright: The AFC Women's Asian Cup logo was originally included but has since been removed due to copyright concerns. The AFC explicitly states that it retains exclusive ownership of its logos and branding. As noted in the AFC RIGHTS PROTECTION GUIDELINES – AFC COMPETITIONS, "The AFC is committed to safeguarding its IP, including trademarks, logos, official branding, match footage and other proprietary content. As the exclusive owner of these rights, AFC implements robust policies and procedures to protect its IP from unauthorised use, reproduction or distribution." Given this, I am concerned that the logo may not meet Commons' licensing requirements and believe its removal is prudent unless clear permission is documented. Style: Section naming was adjusted per WN:Style. Infobox and appropriate categories have been added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4867405 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Copyright: The AFC Women's Asian Cup logo was originally included but has since been removed due to copyright concerns. The AFC explicitly states that it retains exclusive ownership of its logos and branding. As noted in the AFC RIGHTS PROTECTION GUIDELINES – AFC COMPETITIONS, "The AFC is committed to safeguarding its IP, including trademarks, logos, official branding, match footage and other proprietary content. As the exclusive owner of these rights, AFC implements robust policies and procedures to protect its IP from unauthorised use, reproduction or distribution." Given this, I am concerned that the logo may not meet Commons' licensing requirements and believe its removal is prudent unless clear permission is documented. Style: Section naming was adjusted per WN:Style. Infobox and appropriate categories have been added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Photo for lede
[edit]Kids playing soccer doesn't seem to fit the story. @Michael.C.Wright, @Gryllida BigKrow (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Headline change
[edit]@BigKrow, why did you change the headline after publication? I don't believe this is typically permitted or is something we normally do after publication, even within 24 hours (but I could be wrong).Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 21:06, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I thought I did before publication oops sorry. @Michael.C.Wright BigKrow (talk) 21:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Please keep in mind that each time a headline is changed, a redirect is created. It’s best to settle on a headline early and avoid unnecessary renames. In this case, the headline was changed and then changed back, creating multiple redirects and potentially a redirect loop. I marked four redirects for this page for deletion. Excess redirects can cause redirect loops or chains, especially when titles are reused, which should never happen, but could.
- Thanks.Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 13:38, 4 July 2025 (UTC)