Talk:Brazil's supreme court sentences former president Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years in prison

Review of revision 4879285 [Passed]

Revision 4879285 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:23, 17 September 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: As part of the review process, edits focused on aligning the article with WN:Style, improving accuracy, and ensuring verifiability. Changes included reordering paragraphs into inverted pyramid structure, correcting minor typos and style issues (dates, numbers, italics, quotation marks), replacing with local links, and tightening phrasing. Substantive adjustments clarified sourcing: removing unsupported claims, rephrasing allegations, and balancing with judicial dissent and expert opinion. Thank you for indicating sources for statements. That helps the review process. I left the Wikidata links to source authors in place, though this is non-standard. While they may offer disambiguation or background for some users, their practical value to most Wikinews readers is likely limited. It could, however, be interesting to explore a pop-up feature that draws author details from Wikidata. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4879285 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:23, 17 September 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: As part of the review process, edits focused on aligning the article with WN:Style, improving accuracy, and ensuring verifiability. Changes included reordering paragraphs into inverted pyramid structure, correcting minor typos and style issues (dates, numbers, italics, quotation marks), replacing with local links, and tightening phrasing. Substantive adjustments clarified sourcing: removing unsupported claims, rephrasing allegations, and balancing with judicial dissent and expert opinion. Thank you for indicating sources for statements. That helps the review process. I left the Wikidata links to source authors in place, though this is non-standard. While they may offer disambiguation or background for some users, their practical value to most Wikinews readers is likely limited. It could, however, be interesting to explore a pop-up feature that draws author details from Wikidata. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Thank you for the review! The mismatched sentence "Their lawyers expressed their intention to appeal..." was bothering me a bit, but I was afraid of making an edit that could interfere with your review. And thanks for leaving the Wikidata links in place! Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:25, 17 September 2025 (UTC)