Talk:Caloundra win round 3 game in Australian soccer's Football Queensland Premier League 2 competition

Original reporting

I was at this game taking photos and doing interviews. You may be able to see me in the highlights package (behind the goals for one of the goals).

The interview with Caloundra captain Kaine Frew is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD_kaAsp--8

The interview with Pine Hills assistant coach Daniel Cunha is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZQrNCMmrmY

I hesitate to upload them here because I'm not sure on the technical requirements for this site. I can't upload them to Commons because of the media accreditation terms for the league. RockerballAustralia contribs 01:10, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

You are able to upload a video of your own here, up to 100MB in size, and you would need to license it as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. Select "own work, non-commercial through restrictive covenant from the licensing drop-down when uploading. 100MB may be too restrictive for video, especially modern, high-def.

I've been able to use the YouTube links for previous articles just fine, so if you can't or don't want to upload it, I don't see a problem.Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 13:13, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Review of revision 4998248 [Not ready]

Revision 4998248 of this article has been reviewed by Lofi Gurl (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: none of the sources are even news articles. The "Caloundra" link in this article leads to a nonexistent Wikipedia article. I know Wikinews doesn't have the same notability guidelines as Wikipedia, but this doesn't fill me with confidence this will pass our newsworthiness threshold. Verifiability: Not ready: We don't use YouTube for sourcing. The other sources that support the focal point don't seem reliable. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Thank you for the submission. Keep trying. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4998248 of this article has been reviewed by Lofi Gurl (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: none of the sources are even news articles. The "Caloundra" link in this article leads to a nonexistent Wikipedia article. I know Wikinews doesn't have the same notability guidelines as Wikipedia, but this doesn't fill me with confidence this will pass our newsworthiness threshold. Verifiability: Not ready: We don't use YouTube for sourcing. The other sources that support the focal point don't seem reliable. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Thank you for the submission. Keep trying. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

If anyone feels differently about this feel free to override me on this one. Thanks. Lofi Gurl (talk) 01:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Lofi. The two links that aren't news articles are the official highlights from the official live stream (YouTube) and the official match log (Squadi).

YouTube source wouldn't ordinarily be reliable – because it may be just some random person uploading to the site. To my understanding there are exceptions for uploads that we can verify as coming from official sources – in this case either Football Queensland or the mentioned clubs – or reporters uploading their original interviews as I have done above.

I've fixed the Caloundra wikilink. --RockerballAustralia contribs 02:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Perhaps someone other than me should look at this then. I don't know shit about reviewing original reports. Lofi Gurl (talk) 02:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Review of revision 4998827 [Passed]

Revision 4998827 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:36, March 18, 2026 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No real work needed to be done here. Thank you for following Caloundra's progress and reporting it here! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4998827 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:36, March 18, 2026 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No real work needed to be done here. Thank you for following Caloundra's progress and reporting it here! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

-- Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 13:36, 18 March 2026 (UTC)