Talk:Campaign offices for John McCain evacuated in Centennial, Colorado and Manchester, New Hampshire, USA

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Just wondering[edit]

This is the second time I've seen this:
"Edits will be incorporated into the stable version once an established user reviews them..."
What's the purpose of this? How do you qualify as an "established user"? What is this? -- Poe Joe (Talk) 00:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We are hoping to provide news that is devoid of vandalism. The previous lack of editorial control prevented Wikinews articles from being listed at news-aggregators such as Google News. For specifics about this user class you may want to read Wikinews:Editor, however it is rather new and not all aspects have been worked out yet.--SVTCobra 01:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Headline[edit]

The length is probably unnecessary. "Campaign offices for John McCain evacuated" would have sufficed.--71.82.81.238 06:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That title would assume that all his offices were evacuated, which in this case, only two were evacuated. its the Who what and where. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 19:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

US Biased[edit]

There is considerable US bias in this story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.186.56 (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its a US story about a potential US president where the incidents happened in US states...How can this article include foreign relations? You cannot have a US biased on a US story IMO. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 19:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We could, for example, highlight Germany's response to this evacuation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.186.56 (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Germany? Why? and why would they have anything to say about this? DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 20:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We could also state the the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada has apologized for the situation. I don't know if they have, but they seem to issue random apologies on a regular basis, so it's a fair bet that we could find a generic one to fit this situation. Gopher65talk 20:26, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. The Mind's Eye (talk) 20:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]