Jump to content

Comments:Experimental AIDS vaccine fails; volunteers now infected

Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
(Redirected from Talk:Experimental AIDS vaccine fails; volunteers now infected/Comments)
Latest comment: 17 years ago by DragonFire1024 in topic Eerie

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Eerie

[edit]

Now that is just wrong. These people now have ruined lives that will require a lifetime of medicine, that cannot even help them...eerie...DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I think the way this article is worded may lead people to believe that the vaccine CAUSED the volunteers (mostly homosexual men and female sex worrkers) to CONTRACT HIV. But accorinding to CBS News, the volunteers were considered high risk and it seems they got the disease from their own activities, not as a result of this test. The tragedy here is that the number of persons infected from the dummy group and the real vaccine group were about the same; thus making the vaccine, at least in its current incarnation, appear ineffective. Please change the wording of the article. Thanks.

words that may lead to confusion

[edit]

I'm afraid the wording "The majority of the volunteers were either homosexual males or female sex workers" may lead the general audience to confuse homosexual males with sex workers. In my opinion it should be specified that homosexual males that were part of the program might have had multiple partners.