Talk:Experts raise serious questions over safety of U.S. oil industry and warn another spill may be 'unavoidable'
Review of revision 1215437 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 1215437 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Other than a few style errors here and there which I've correct, this a bloody excellent article wace. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1215437 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Other than a few style errors here and there which I've correct, this a bloody excellent article wace. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
"and" in headlines[edit]
Just a note, the style guide says to avoid the word "and" in headlines—in most cases, including this one, it can be replaced with a comma. I'm not going to move the article, because it's really a non-issue and we should avoid moving published articles if we can help it, so just consider this a quick heads-up. DENDODGE 15:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)