Talk:Government shuts off water to California farms in controversial effort to help threatened species

Review of revision 860254 [Failed]

Revision 860254 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not ready: very anti-federal government Style: Not ready: see WN:NC Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 860254 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not ready: very anti-federal government Style: Not ready: see WN:NC Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Thanks for the review. Aside from slapping the story down as anti-government, which is hard not to do considering that the Federal Government is basically making a farming town extinct (which is why it is a story), and the style, did you have any suggestions for content or style? DavidBailey (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I've tried to tone down the article and renamed the article to meet the naming conventions. How about any other suggestions? I think this story is amazing. DavidBailey (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the changes you made. It is much better now. Sorry if my review was terse. I was at work and didn't have time to elaborate. --SVTCobra 02:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 860990 [Passed]

Revision 860990 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It is a bit sketchy to let the interview make this current, but it is interesting and we have had no coverage of anything even close to related to this. SVTCobra 02:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 860990 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It is a bit sketchy to let the interview make this current, but it is interesting and we have had no coverage of anything even close to related to this. SVTCobra 02:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Yeah, I noticed it had been ongoing for a while, but the fact that the unemployment is up to 40% and town police chiefs are talking about the town disappearing make the story worth visiting, I think. DavidBailey (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)