Talk:Gunman dies, police officer injured after stand-off ends in West Yorkshire, England

Review of revision 1151360 [Failed]

Revision 1151360 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Three items, listed below. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Things I cannot confirm from the cited sources: The BBC Cameraman quotes. That the threatening was inside a home. The sources say a "property", not even necessarily a home, let alone inside one. That the gunman spoke with negotiators at all (though apparently they spoke at him). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1151360 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Three items, listed below. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Things I cannot confirm from the cited sources: The BBC Cameraman quotes. That the threatening was inside a home. The sources say a "property", not even necessarily a home, let alone inside one. That the gunman spoke with negotiators at all (though apparently they spoke at him). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Broadcast notes

• Was listening to Radio 5 Live this morning; reporter at scene confirmed gunman was firing from inside home. (I'm sure this was in a source, maybe it was earlier). wackywace 15:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Clarification: What I couldn't confirm was that the earlier incident, for which the police were going to arrest him, had taken place inside a home. --Pi zero (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1151397 [Passed]

Revision 1151397 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1151397 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Kirkheaton and Huddersfield

A question has arisen concerning whether "Kirkheaton, Huddersfield" is correct, i.e., whether Kirkheaton is part of Huddersfield. In this regard, I note from the sources that BBC describes it as "Kirkheaton, Huddersfield", while Sky News describes it as "the Kirkheaton area of Huddersfield". This does not mean the usage is correct, of course. --Pi zero (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I've been offered a most satisfactory explanation of the discrepancy: lazy journalists lumping a small village into the nearest larger locality. Works for me. --Pi zero (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)