Talk:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi promises repeal of three farm laws

Review of revision 4650490 [Not ready]

Revision 4650490 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Copyright violation concerns Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: @2006nishan178713: I'm a bit concerned about a potential copyright violation in regards to the Mint source you've provided. The second and third paragraphs are almost identical to phrasing used in the Mint article on this topic, and while it is understandable somewhat for the second paragraph (it's hard to change the phrasing of bill titles), in combination with the third one, it is concerning. Running the article through a copyright detection tool also returned a 57.8% similarity. While I have not yet reviewed the article to identify any potential issues with its content, would you be able to try and rephrase it so that the copyright violation issue is not of concern? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4650490 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Copyright violation concerns Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: @2006nishan178713: I'm a bit concerned about a potential copyright violation in regards to the Mint source you've provided. The second and third paragraphs are almost identical to phrasing used in the Mint article on this topic, and while it is understandable somewhat for the second paragraph (it's hard to change the phrasing of bill titles), in combination with the third one, it is concerning. Running the article through a copyright detection tool also returned a 57.8% similarity. While I have not yet reviewed the article to identify any potential issues with its content, would you be able to try and rephrase it so that the copyright violation issue is not of concern? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Will fix it soon 2006nishan178713 (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Farmers/opposition parties

@2006nishan178713: Apologies, I've been busy with stuff lately and so have not been able to get to Wikinews. I have begun reviewing this article, and while I'm fairly pleased with it, there are just some issues that need to be addressed first. Instead of using terms such as "farmers" and "opposition parties", would you be able to specify specific farmers' groups or specific farmers' advocates, as well as specific political parties? That's all for now, but I do really appreciate the work you've been putting in and I hope this article can be published :) --LivelyRatification (talk) 23:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

I agree, personal life can always get in the way. Anyways, the "opposition parties" issues have been fixed. But specifying farmers' groups or advocates might not be possible, as no information regarding those things are present. The major group is the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Indian Farmers Union), which is already specified and for 'advocates', Rakesh Tikait is mentioned (as no other information available). Neutrally speaking, there are no political parties involved in the protests. Indian National Congress has been added in place of just 'opposition parties', specifying the political party who said the quote added. 2006nishan178713 (talk) 03:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Final translation

@2006nishan178713: One last thing - it'd be best to have the entire last sentence either in English or, where transliterated from Hindu, with an English translation in the source. I would suggest replacing that with simply the translated quotes that have been provided in the articles. I would do this myself, but I do not wish to disqualify myself from reviewing this. --LivelyRatification (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The words "satyagraha" and "annadata" have changed to their appropriate English translations. 2006nishan178713 (talk) 06:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

This is the source of the quote, https://twitter.com/RahulGandhi/status/1461550273185255424

It's in Hindi. 2006nishan178713 (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

@2006nishan178713: I wasn't asking for an English translation of those words - apologies for the confusion. I was asking for the phrases that contained Hindu transliteration without translation into English in the sources to be replaced. The Scroll source appears to have translated "annadata" to farmers, so I would suggest quoting that directly, but excluding "satyagraha" from the article as it has not been translated by any source. LivelyRatification (talk) 06:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

No worries!! Is it alright now? 2006nishan178713 (talk) 06:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Review of revision 4650760 [Passed]

Revision 4650760 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: @2006nishan178713: Congratulations on getting your first article published! There were a few issues to sort out in the review process, but those have been dealt with. For future, feel free to take a look at this article's edit history for tips on what you could change and guides such as Wikinews:Writing an article and Wikinews:Style guide! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4650760 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: @2006nishan178713: Congratulations on getting your first article published! There were a few issues to sort out in the review process, but those have been dealt with. For future, feel free to take a look at this article's edit history for tips on what you could change and guides such as Wikinews:Writing an article and Wikinews:Style guide! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.