Talk:Iran: Wreckage found of plane crashed in mountains; all believed dead

Main date

Mustn't this be 20 February instead of 19? See [1]. De Wikischim (talk) 20:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Review of revision 4385502 [Not ready]

Revision 4385502 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: My preliminary check for similarities to source turned up nine problem passages. Three were rather long, and two others though short were from the same source sentence (with one word between in both versions, though that one word wasn't even the same part of speech). It would be over-much for me to address as reviewer, and there's a suspicion more might be lurking that the automation failed to clue me in to. Here's the ones I found, including even the most minor that I noted (keeping in mind, small stuff sometimes later turns out to be part of a larger pattern). lede, "a peak [...] Mountains" (9 words, semi-mundane place description but distinctive wording and could be rephrased). paragraph 3 sentence 3, "[im]possible [...] area" (7 words, with a small omission) sentence 4, "at dawn [...] grounded" (two 4-word passages with the intervening word "helicopter") sentence 5, "officials [...] but" (8 words with an omission) sentence 6, "More [...] Dena Koor" (15 words with a couple of superficial changes) paragraph 5 sentence 3, "lifted under a 2015 agreement" (yeah, that one's pretty minor; five words, though, and could be tweaked structurally so it'd disappear entirely) paragraph 6: sentence 1, "accidents in recent years", and sentence 2, "pilot of the crashed plane" (both way down near the lower limit of notice, but somewhat distinctive turn of phrase, worth tweaking to get rid of). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4385502 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: My preliminary check for similarities to source turned up nine problem passages. Three were rather long, and two others though short were from the same source sentence (with one word between in both versions, though that one word wasn't even the same part of speech). It would be over-much for me to address as reviewer, and there's a suspicion more might be lurking that the automation failed to clue me in to. Here's the ones I found, including even the most minor that I noted (keeping in mind, small stuff sometimes later turns out to be part of a larger pattern). lede, "a peak [...] Mountains" (9 words, semi-mundane place description but distinctive wording and could be rephrased). paragraph 3 sentence 3, "[im]possible [...] area" (7 words, with a small omission) sentence 4, "at dawn [...] grounded" (two 4-word passages with the intervening word "helicopter") sentence 5, "officials [...] but" (8 words with an omission) sentence 6, "More [...] Dena Koor" (15 words with a couple of superficial changes) paragraph 5 sentence 3, "lifted under a 2015 agreement" (yeah, that one's pretty minor; five words, though, and could be tweaked structurally so it'd disappear entirely) paragraph 6: sentence 1, "accidents in recent years", and sentence 2, "pilot of the crashed plane" (both way down near the lower limit of notice, but somewhat distinctive turn of phrase, worth tweaking to get rid of). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Thanks for looking at it; I'll go edit it now. This was hard because there were so many sources to use, and I found someone else was already using the phrasing I'd intended. Let me see what I can do. Yngvadottir (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Splitting paragraphs; remark

As for this; an addition such as [Perhaps as a result], there have been a number of... etc. might clarify the author's intention. But others here will likely find this too much speculation. De Wikischim (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Review of revision 4385670 [Passed]

Revision 4385670 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4385670 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

• Should have made the headline more specific before publishing. (Drat.) --Pi zero (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)