Talk:Israeli naval ships intercept Gaza-bound Global Sumud Flotilla
Add topicAI use
[edit]I have used AI. BigKrow (talk) 23:14, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Israeli naval ships intercept Gaza-bound Global Sumud Flotilla
- Violation suspected
- 93.8%
- similarity
- en.wikinews.org/wiki/Israeli_naval_ships_intercept_Gaza-bound_Global_Sumud_Flotilla
- @Gryllida, @Michael.C.Wright
- Not a good sign, almost 100% copyvio! BigKrow (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Israeli naval ships intercept Gaza-bound Global Sumud Flotilla
- Violation unlikely
- 16.7%
- similarity
- edition.cnn.com/2025/10/01/middleeast/israel-gaza-flotilla-explainer-scli-intl
- Better now? BigKrow (talk) 16:14, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- BigKrow (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Israeli naval ships intercept Gaza-bound Global Sumud Flotilla
- Violation unlikely
- 8.3%
- similarity
- edition.cnn.com/2025/10/01/middleeast/israel-gaza-flotilla-explainer-scli-intl BigKrow (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- @BigKrow I tried to refocus on the news. The lengthy review... it's best to have this paper polished before the next reviewer sees it. ~ Sheminghui.WU (talk) 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- It also needs wiki-linking, @Sheminghui.WU BigKrow (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- Please add it. I'm not farmiliar with this Sheminghui.WU (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sheminghui.WU, no thanks. BigKrow (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Wikilinks have been added. Your latest edit says that news from October 8th still cannot be published? In addition, I don't recommend creating tons of articles that you can't finish, even though this is a wiki, that's just my personal advice. ~ Sheminghui.WU (talk) 03:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sheminghui.WU, no thanks. BigKrow (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Please add it. I'm not farmiliar with this Sheminghui.WU (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- It also needs wiki-linking, @Sheminghui.WU BigKrow (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- @BigKrow I tried to refocus on the news. The lengthy review... it's best to have this paper polished before the next reviewer sees it. ~ Sheminghui.WU (talk) 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- BigKrow (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Review of revision 4882200 [Not ready]
[edit]  |
Revision 4882200 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: 1. Date missing in first paragraph 2. Need more numbers i.e. number of people on board, number of ships 3. Would be good to add more background like whether this was legal. Seems essential. 4. Would be good to write more clearly what is going to happen next after the ships were captured. 5. With usage of AI I would recommend documenting what prompts were used. Please see Wikinews:AI tips from Gryllida for details. Thank you. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4882200 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: 1. Date missing in first paragraph 2. Need more numbers i.e. number of people on board, number of ships 3. Would be good to add more background like whether this was legal. Seems essential. 4. Would be good to write more clearly what is going to happen next after the ships were captured. 5. With usage of AI I would recommend documenting what prompts were used. Please see Wikinews:AI tips from Gryllida for details. Thank you. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
How's it look now? @Gryllida: BigKrow (talk) 15:48, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Review of revision 4884675 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 4884675 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: article conternt should be in past tense - i fixed that i re-added 'why' in first paragraph: mention blockade - i fixed that i suggest to add images if they are available if needed, edits to the article can be reviewed and approved within 24 hours after publication this is borderline stale but new developments and lack of activity on site leaded me to approving the story - this is not precedent thank you The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4884675 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: article conternt should be in past tense - i fixed that i re-added 'why' in first paragraph: mention blockade - i fixed that i suggest to add images if they are available if needed, edits to the article can be reviewed and approved within 24 hours after publication this is borderline stale but new developments and lack of activity on site leaded me to approving the story - this is not precedent thank you The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
@Gryllida:, big thanks! BigKrow (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- I created the WD item for this article, User:BigKrow and User:Gryllida. Redireditor (talk)aka Dsuke1998AEOS 18:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @Dsuke1998AEOS BigKrow (talk) 18:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Gryllida 12:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)