Talk:Lancet release yearly Countdown report raising alarm of increase in heat caused deaths

Notes from Gryllida

My "or" included downloading the original document. It is kind of paywalled as it requires to sign up for an account. The document has been forwarded to scoop.

I did not add categories. Someone please do it. I don't have HotCat (haven't had it for years) and do not remember how to enable it.

After your review, or with any question, please use #wikinews-en ^{live connect} to ping my nick, "Gry", and stay connected for up to 6 hours. Then I can inquire about collaborative editing if needed.

Thank you. 😊 Gryllida (talk) 10:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Done adding categories. CSM.in (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

I've checked the scoop email but the attachment appears not to have come through. Might be worth resending. RockerballAustralia contribs 07:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

resent in parts as file is too big Gryllida (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Document parts received. Curious to know what happened to page 12. I'm guessing it as omitted because it wasn't needed or was blank. RockerballAustralia contribs 09:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

was too heavy :-( even as one page. over 10mb or whatever limit of server. i will try to resend Gryllida (talk) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

sent a screenshot of it Gryllida (talk) 10:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

could we possibly get some IM going, i am often on mobile and i do not get push notifications of any new on wiki events sadly. 😥

i tried sms, but never got a reply [Edit: got a reply 2 times out of more than 10], i think we need to try something else.

instant communication could help a lot with publishing timely.

i have a bunch of accounts on "social media", which are listed on my user page. i can use twitter messages as last resort if that is what you prefer. please let me know. 🙂 Gryllida (talk) 10:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Received page 12. Shame the scoop server couldn't handle the size. RockerballAustralia contribs 02:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Neutral point of view

The Lancet is not without its share of editorial[1] and scientific controversies[2] (I'm not suggesting using WP as a source, just an example). What do critics say of the report, its methods and findings, or the Lancet itself? —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 15:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Review of revision 4803774 [Passed]

Revision 4803774 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4803774 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.