Jump to content

Talk:Max Scherzer signs deal to return to Toronto Blue Jays

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Michael.C.Wright in topic Category Toronto?

Really hoping to get this one published

[edit]

@Michael.C.Wright, @Gryllida

I'm focused on writing more positive news, thanks I put up for pre-review for possible feedback! Don Don 18:31, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, what is the date if the event? Please include in first parahraph. Gryllida (talk) 19:05, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Done @Gryllida Don Don 19:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pre Review

[edit]

Status:    Recommend publish

Version evaluated: 4991635

Notes for author(s):

No notes provided for author

Notes for reviewer:

No notes provided for reviewer


This is a pre-review only and is not part of the official review process. A pre-review is meant to help the author or authors improve the article and increase the likelihood of it passing a formal review. This pre-review was not done by a reviewer and represents a recommendation that can be heeded or ignored.



--DrKay (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Review of revision 4991691 [Passed]

[edit]

-- Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 17:57, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Shi Davidi reported that Max Scherzer is returning to the Toronto Blue Jays on a one-year deal with a low base salary and significant incentives
@Michael.C.Wright Don Don 18:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
https://www.sportsnet.ca/mlb/article/what-the-max-scherzer-signing-means-for-the-blue-jays/ Don Don 18:20, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
first reported by Sportsnet colleague Shi Davidi. @Michael.C.Wright Don Don 18:21, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I had to use ai though.
Perplexity
I just searched didn't really use ai for article @Michael.C.Wright Don Don 18:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please be sure in the future that all output, regardless of its source, whether AI or otherwise is properly sourced. We shouldn't rely solely on the review process to ensure our articles are accurate and verifiable for our readers.Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 21:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Correction for paywalled source

[edit]


This conversation has been marked for the community's attention. Please remove the {{flag}} when the discussion is complete or no longer important.


The News Tribune source article has since been paywalled. When published, I was not aware News Tribune used a paywall. I have issued a correction but not self-sighted at this time. I have also reduced protection to allow a non-admin reviewer to sight, edit, or revert it prior to archival. If it isn't sighted soon, I may self-sight.Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 08:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category Toronto?

[edit]

can someone add? @Michael.C.Wright ~2026-20994-53 (talk) 12:33, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category:Toronto, Ontario ~2026-20994-53 (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Done but not sighted, as there is a pending correction that must also be sighted first.Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 13:15, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply