Talk:New South Wales state MP Glenn Brookes moves to crossbench over electoral allegations
Review of revision 4200979 [Not ready][edit]
Revision 4200979 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4200979 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 4201157 [Not ready][edit]
Revision 4201157 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4201157 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Status[edit]
Honestly, I'd hoped I might review this on Wednesday (UTC). I'm unsure of the status of the focus here, notably re corroboration and freshness, which would be points of interest to me in a review; and certainly having missed Wednesday can't help the freshness. (Alas, it's quite late where I am — on the opposite side of the world from NSW — and I'm not able to undertake a nontrivial review for at least the next nine hours or so.) --Pi zero (talk) 02:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- I've taken a preliminary look at this; there are two outstanding issues I have my eye on, and I'm ready to start the source-check phase of review (the most intensive part).
- The phrase "move to the cross bench" won't mean anything to many international readers who don't live in a country with a parliament (which includes a large number of readers in the US); clarification is needed.
- Looking at the structure of the first sentence of the currently-third paragraph, it seems to say that Brookes made this denial while in the process of winning the district by 0.8 percent; there's something odd there that needs a rephrase for clarity. I suspect the intent was merely to weave in the fact that Brookes had won by a small margin.
- At this moment, I need to take a break; hopefully, if someone else doesn't get to the article in the meanwhile, I can take it up again sometime in the next few hours (morning, here). --Pi zero (talk) 11:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Review of revision 4201546 [Passed][edit]
Revision 4201546 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4201546 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |