Talk:New cabinet formed in Bermuda following election

Article stages templates

Moondragon21, thank you for starting another article! I just found it while looking for stale and abandoned articles and noticed that the article was started with the {{tasks}} template. That template is normally added only after the article has been developed to a point that someone else has evaluated it and has provided feedback.

Articles typically start with the {{develop}} template, which I have applied here. If you want to request a review, switch that template to {{review}}. If you are seeking assistance from other authors, you can use {{Helpneeded}}.

Let me know if you have any questions. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 15:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! :-) Moondragon21 (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Pre-review

Status:    Recommend publish

Version evaluated: 4840930

• Copyright: Passed
• Newsworthiness: Passed
• Verifiability: Passed
• NPOV: Passed
• Style: Passed

Notes for author(s):

Be careful with "scuffing up" original sources. It could still be considered a copyright violation. See more here: Wikinews:Tips_on_reviewing_articles#Copyvio.

I remove a couple of instances of analysis. Focus on just stating the facts, even if that results in a seemingly dry article.

As it stands, the article should pass review.

Notes for reviewer:

I have used {{verify}} to indicate sources for statements.

---

This is a pre-review only and is not part of the official review process. A pre-review is meant to help the author or authors improve the article and increase the likelihood of it passing a formal review. This pre-review was not done by a reviewer and represents a recommendation that can be heeded or ignored.

—Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 16:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Stale

The article unfortunately went stale while before being submitted for review. If there is more recent news coverage for the event, the article can be refocused on the newest event and resubmitted for review. We call this gatwicking and you can read about it here: WN:Gatwicking. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 17:37, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

How could this be done? Today the new cabinet was sworn in so could this be used (https://bernews.com/2025/02/photos-cabinet-ministers-swearing-in-ceremony/) Moondragon21 (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Yes, you can refocus the article (and headline) on that new focal event.

To change the headline you need to move (rename) the article. I can help with that if you'd like, just tell me what you want the new headline to be.

Move the statement you added at the end of the article to the lede (first paragraph) and flesh it out a bit more by answering the WN:5Ws of the new focal event. The rest of the article can remain largely as it is, serving as general and background info to the new focal event. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 14:49, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Ok thanks. Please could it be renamed to "New cabinet formed in Bermuda following election" Moondragon21 (talk) 15:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Done —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 14:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

We need one more new source to support the new focal event before this can be reviewed again, per WN:Gatwicking. The lede should also be expanded a bit more. It does answer the 5Ws, but could provide more depth to draw in the reader. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 15:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Feel free to re-request review when you have the second source added. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 15:20, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Michael.C.Wright, I have added another source and expanded the lede. Please can it be re-reviewed. Moondragon21 (talk) 00:18, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Review of revision 4842500 [Passed]

Revision 4842500 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thank you for sticking with this one, Moondragon21! Your patience in learning how to Gatwick is much appreciated. My primary feedback is to be careful with analysis.[1], [2], [3] Wikinews:Neutrality#Attributing_claims_of_fact has good advice on how to identify and avoid reporting it as facts. I also reordered the Sources section to comply with WN:Sources.[4], [5] Remember to list them newest to oldest. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4842500 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thank you for sticking with this one, Moondragon21! Your patience in learning how to Gatwick is much appreciated. My primary feedback is to be careful with analysis.[6], [7], [8] Wikinews:Neutrality#Attributing_claims_of_fact has good advice on how to identify and avoid reporting it as facts. I also reordered the Sources section to comply with WN:Sources.[9], [10] Remember to list them newest to oldest. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.